The Decimation of U.S. Exchange Programs 93% Cut to US Study Abroad Programs: What It Means for Global Education

In early May 2025, the U.S. State Department released its Fiscal Year 2026 "skinny" budget, proposing a staggering 93% cut to international exchange programs. If enacted, this would decimate the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA), eliminating flagship initiatives like the Fulbright Program, Gilman Scholarship, and Critical Language Scholarships. The proposed cuts would slash funding by approximately $691 million and jeopardize over 8,000 jobs.

The Alliance's Response

The Alliance for International Exchange has launched a campaign urging Congress to reject the proposed budget cuts. In just 72 hours, nearly 12,000 letters were sent to lawmakers, highlighting the widespread concern within the education community. Mark Overmann, executive director of the Alliance, criticized the proposal, stating it reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the value of exchange programs. He emphasized that these programs are among the most cost-effective in the federal government, with 90% of the ECA's budget directly benefiting American students abroad and international participants in the U.S.

The Value of Exchange Programs

Exchange programs play a crucial role in fostering global understanding and diplomacy. The Fulbright Program alone supports over 2,200 U.S. students studying abroad annually and brings approximately 4,000 international students to the U.S. These initiatives contribute to building international relationships and enhancing America's global competitiveness.

The proposed budget cuts would not only diminish these opportunities but also undermine the U.S.'s soft power and leadership in global education. Stakeholders argue that such drastic reductions would isolate the country at a time when international collaboration is more important than ever.

The Economic Impact

Beyond their diplomatic benefits, international exchange programs have a significant economic impact. According to the State Department, 90% of the ECA's budget is spent on Americans travelling abroad or by international participants while in the U.S. This spending supports local economies, creates jobs, and generates revenue for educational institutions.

The Path Forward: Advocacy and Engagement

The proposed budget cuts are not final; they are part of the President's Budget Request (PBR), which is subject to approval by Congress. The Alliance for International Exchange encourages all stakeholders—students, educators, alumni, and community members—to engage with their representatives, expressing the value of international exchange programs and urging them to support their funding. Through collective advocacy, it is possible to protect and strengthen these vital programs.

Looking Ahead

As Congress prepares to review the proposed budget, the future of U.S. study abroad programs hangs in the balance. The outcome will depend on the collective advocacy of the education community and the recognition by lawmakers of the long-term benefits these programs offer to students, institutions, and the nation as a whole.

The situation remains fluid, and stakeholders are urged to stay informed and engaged as developments unfold. The coming weeks will be critical in determining the direction of U.S. international exchange programs and their role in shaping the country's global presence.