Trump Administration Blocks Harvard from Enrolling New International Students Amid Legal Battle

On May 22, 2025, the Trump administration revoked Harvard University's certification to enrol international students, effectively barring new admissions for the 2025–2026 academic year and requiring current international students to transfer or risk losing their legal status. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem justified the decision by accusing Harvard of failing to comply with federal reporting requirements and of alleged misconduct, including fostering antisemitism and collaborating with foreign governments.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security
"The administration is holding Harvard accountable for fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus. Let this serve as a warning to all universities and academic institutions across the country."

Key Developments

• Revocation of SEVP Certification: On May 22, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) revoked Harvard's certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), effectively barring the university from enrolling new international students. This action was justified by DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, who cited concerns over campus safety, antisemitism, and the presence of foreign "pro-terrorist" agitators. Harvard, which enrolls approximately 7,000 international students—over 25% of its student body—argued that the revocation lacked lawful justification and violates constitutional rights.
• Allegations and Justifications: The administration cited concerns over Harvard's alleged failure to comply with federal reporting requirements and its handling of campus protests. Specifically, DHS accused the university of fostering a "toxic campus climate" and alleged ties to the Chinese Communist Party. These claims have been met with skepticism and criticism from various quarters. 
• Harvard's Response: Harvard University swiftly filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, challenging the revocation as unconstitutional and retaliatory. The university argues that the action infringes upon its academic freedoms and the rights of its international students.
• Financial Implications: The administration has also withheld billions in federal research funding from Harvard since March 2025, citing concerns over antisemitism and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. These actions have led to budget cuts, layoffs, and strategic shifts within the university.

Legal and Institutional Repercussions

• Temporary Legal Relief: A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order blocking the implementation of the SEVP revocation, allowing current international students to maintain their status at Harvard. However, this order is temporary, and a more permanent resolution is pending.
  
  
• Broader Impact on Higher Education: This move is part of a broader pattern of federal actions against universities, particularly those with significant international student populations. The Trump administration has previously imposed funding freezes and other measures against institutions like Columbia University, citing concerns over campus environments and foreign influence.

International Reactions

• Hong Kong's Offer: In response to the U.S. government's actions, Hong Kong has extended invitations to affected students, offering expedited admissions and support. This move underscores the broader implications of the dispute on international academic relations.

Conclusion

The ongoing legal battle between Harvard University and the Trump administration highlights significant tensions over academic freedom, immigration policies, and the role of international students in U.S. higher education. As the situation develops, its outcomes may set precedents affecting universities nationwide and their relationships with federal authorities.